| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Why is bob closed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Amber Coldheart Originally by: Nathaniel Derooy Considering the mp3, I would file a Lawsuit if i were BoB member in either US, UK, Netherlands or Germany based upon recent Courthearings regarding virtual property in ...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2009.02.05 16:58:00
|
2. New way to exploit the Aggression counter? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If there is dirty pool here to keep a counter running that should be classified as an exploit, just on general principle. However, I suppose it's worth asking if there is any chance someone in the aggressors camp had kill rights rather than just ...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2008.12.23 21:53:00
|
3. Starbase exploit addressed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Rethyl I'm certainly willing to believe this bug has *existed* for years, but I'm not convinced yet that people have been exploiting it on a wide scale for years. Alright, but the issue then becomes the definition of w...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2008.12.11 17:35:00
|
4. Maelstrom Fits Missions - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I've found this to be very effective. 8 x 1400mm Artillery (I like Prototypes for cost effectiveness/fitting) 1 x T2 X-L Shield Booster 1 x LiF Booster (AB) 2 x T2 Shield Amplifiers 2 x Hardeners of choice (pair of T2 invuln's is pretty effective...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2008.12.10 22:16:00
|
5. I grave day in eve history? I think not. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sam442 Originally by: Spinals Blah blah balh. This doesn't make up for the thousands of family photos, precious documents and other irreplaceable work documents lost - but its a start. Lost? ummmmmm you seem to...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.12.06 19:19:00
|
6. hal.dll issues after patch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Re-installing windows as we speak (as I was an idiot and didn't make the backup I had intended last week as originally planned... funny how something always takes priority over something so simple and obviously useful...) But I had the exact same...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.12.06 17:07:00
|
7. Stasis Webifiers - Are you happy with them? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The real irony of all this is that the speed issue is primarily about one module: MWD. In CCP's infinite wisdom they thought it would be better to nerf every single speed fit component in the game that was otherwise _not broken_ and leave that li...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.10.30 01:33:00
|
8. EVE Ambulation (aka Full Body Avatar) Discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon you don't have to use it. ever wonder why your being webbed when your out of range? ever wonder why a ship breaks away form your web. ever wonder why the ******* running away breaking your web is tanking back up...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.10.29 05:09:00
|
9. EVE Ambulation (aka Full Body Avatar) Discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Personally, I cannot think of a more arbitrary, FOTM, staggeringly impressive waste of development time than this, especially considering that it's essentially just being used as a test bed at Eve customers expense for future WW development. This...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.10.29 05:02:00
|
10. Target painters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
A target painter increases the Signature of the target ship. Therefore, anything that uses that ships signature as part of the calculation such as (but not necessairly limited to): a. Turret to hit calcs b. Missile damage calcs c. Lock on times...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.10.04 21:22:00
|
11. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kristov Keen Really nice idea. It could be a solution to macroers. if you suspect someone is macroing you could shoot them (in a frig at first) and see if they react by calling for concord. if they don't just keep on shootin...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.11 22:39:00
|
12. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: SithSnak3 I mention this over a year ago, and was told to Take it on the chin.its part of eve. yes,It is a major glinch, the player should have the option to decide to Kill the said party by way of concord, or to refuss any ...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.11 22:32:00
|
13. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nicoli Malthus Signed and signed again! There are a bunch of awesome ideas here, that would really make the game more fun. Personally i like high sec better, because it's no fun at all trying to go to lowsec, even if it is ...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.11 17:50:00
|
14. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Some excellent ideas on leveraging security status and standings into this I hadn't considered giving them considerably more value. On the thought of local control dispatching standing related forces to assist in low sec? Flavour wise I love it. ...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.11 14:08:00
|
15. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Del Narveux I kinda like this idea, except that concord in highsec (.7 and up at least) still needs to be a total bbqpwn, and concord response in lowsec needs to be really weak, like just a few frigs to help even the odds be...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.10 19:14:00
|
16. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Actually, if done right, it should open up PvP in a more controlled fashion throughout the entirety of high sec as well (only 1.0 being guaranteed immediate response). Please note the percentages were just suggestive.. you could easily scale them...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.09 20:34:00
|
17. Overheating is useless - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Indigo Johnson Heat will shine with T3 modules...or so the concensus goes. So we're told, but we have: a. no details on what T3/heat relationship is b. dissatisfaction currently on how it works with T1/T2 in many cases...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.09 18:26:00
|
18. Everyone move out of empire pirates will not like low security systems - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Altemi Calabre on 09/07/2007 17:29:20 Originally by: Cmdr Sy Low sec risk is fine as it is, it just needs more reward to justify it. One problem is, once you can do low sec, you can do 0.0. So why stay? A lot of good corps ...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.09 17:29:00
|
19. Change "Approach" to "Align-to" when out of Approach Range! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kind of mystified why it doesn't work like this now actually... By all means, make it so! Altemi ~ Why is it those with the greatest responsibility to make good decisions so often seem the least capable or inclined?
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.09 14:59:00
|
20. Concord Policy Change Idea - Distress Beacon, High-Low sec responses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The goal of having such a controlled distress system would be as follows: a. By giving players the control over calling for concord help it lets the pilots determine if they want to summon Concord or not. If you cannot use a distress beacon if y...
- by Altemi Calabre - at 2007.07.09 14:25:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |